TEACHING PRAGMATICS IN ELT: CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE AS A KEY TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
Keywords:
Communication, ELT, effective communication, ELT pedagogy, qualitative approach.Abstract
Teaching pragmatics in English Language Teaching (ELT) is crucial for fostering effective communication among learners. This paper explores the concept of conversational implicature as a fundamental component of pragmatic competence. Conversational implicature refers to the meanings that are implied rather than explicitly stated in conversations, which can significantly influence understanding and interaction. By integrating pragmatic awareness into ELT curricula, educators can equip students with the skills necessary to navigate real-life communication scenarios successfully. This study highlights practical strategies for teaching conversational implicature, including role-playing, context-based discussions, and analyzing authentic dialogues. Ultimately, fostering an understanding of conversational implicature not only enhances language proficiency but also promotes cultural awareness and social sensitivity among learners, enabling them to engage more effectively in diverse communicative contexts.
References
Balaji, V., Padala, S., Josh, S. K., Muhsen, M., Singh, S., Isroilova, B., & Israilova, D. (2024). Finite element analysis of double pipe heat exchanger using nanofluids. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 563, p. 01004). EDP Sciences.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(S1), 68-86.
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1991). Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, 255-272.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 225-252.
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Pearson.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Khursheed, S., Sharma, S., Paul, V. K., Alzubaidi, L. H., & Israilova, D. (2024). Review of the factors inducing delay in construction project material management. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 563, p. 02044). EDP Sciences.
Roever, C. (2012). Testing implicature under realistic conditions: Toward a more valid assessment of second-language pragmatics. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 173-194.
Rose, K. R. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in grammatical and lexical domains. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 381-395.
Rustamova, N., Inoyatova, S., Madazizova, D., Israilova, D., & Israilov, S. (2024). Genetically modified ecosystems: Innovative approaches in agriculture and their environmental impact. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 149, p. 01063). EDP Sciences.
Taguchi, N. (2008). Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 558-576.
Taguchi, N. (2011). The effect of practice on pragmatic development in study abroad contexts. Language Learning, 61(3), 904-939.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Developing interactional competence in a study abroad context. Mouton de Gruyter.
Taguchi, N. (2019). Pragmatic competence. Mouton de Gruyter.
Published
Versions
- 2025-03-14 (2)
- 2025-03-07 (1)
